{"id":34266,"date":"2021-07-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-07-04T23:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/csw-yeo.1wp.site\/blog\/pastors-or-fraudsters-neither-registered-nor-unregistered-religious-5600\/"},"modified":"2026-09-18T22:08:03","modified_gmt":"2026-09-18T21:08:03","slug":"pastors-or-fraudsters-neither-registered-nor-unregistered-religious-5600","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/blog\/pastors-or-fraudsters-neither-registered-nor-unregistered-religious-5600\/","title":{"rendered":"Pastors or fraudsters? Neither registered nor unregistered religious leaders are safe from the Chinese Communist Party\u2019s false allegations"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Under China\u2019s current religious regulations<\/a>, only government-approved faith leaders can carry out government-approved religious activities in government-approved sites. As a result, there are many situations in which a religious leader can find themselves on the wrong side of the law in China, even facing charges that have no apparent connection to religion but can carry lengthy sentences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The widely-reported cases of Pastor Wang Yi<\/a> and Pastor Yang Hua<\/a> highlight how the Chinese authorities prosecute leaders of unregistered Protestant churches with flagrantly baseless criminal charges: \u2018inciting to subvert state power\u2019 and \u2018illegal business operations\u2019 for Wang and \u2018divulging state secrets\u2019 for Yang. Alarmingly, fraud charges seem to have become one of the most damaging tools that the authorities use against pastors, for persecution as well as defamation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Elder Zhang Chunlei<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

On 1 May 2021, the day the new administrative measures on religious clergy came into effect, Love Reformed Church received a notice saying their leader Zhang Chunlei had been officially arrested<\/a> \u2018on suspicion of fraud\u2019. To this, the unregistered church in Guiyang in Guizhou province expressed incredulity in a prayer update<\/a> issued on the same day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Citing the constant harassment, including repeated groundless summons by local police that several church members were subjected to in recent weeks, the statement says: \u201cSome Christians are called to be elders and serve God by serving the church, and some Christians are called to be saints and obey God by providing for the church and servants of Christ: this is how it has been for the past 2000 years. What has it to do with fraud?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Zhang Chunlei. Source: Facebook\/\u5f20\u6625\u96f7<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A look back on the developments of the case tells us the Church has good reasons for believing Mr Zhang has been falsely accused.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On 16 March 2021, the authorities raided a private Christian gathering and detained some members of Love Reformed Church. Later that day, Mr Zhang was also detained for \u2018illegally operating as an association\u2019. On 1 April 2021, reports emerged that Mr Zhang had been criminally detained and was now facing a new charge of \u2018fraud\u2019. Those familiar with the Christian leader bitterly remarked that the turn of events was something like an April Fool\u2019s Day joke.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sui Muqing, a human rights lawyer, revealed<\/a> that Yang Aiqing, Zhang Chunlei\u2019s wife, was served a criminal summons on 21 April 2021, also \u2018on suspicion of fraud\u2019. Ms Yang was continuously interrogated by Guiyang police\u2019s Yunyan branch for 24 hours, during which she was made to wear handcuffs and leg shackles. \u201cAll the questions [the police put to Ms Yang] were about Christian faith and church operations, nothing to do with so called fraud case,\u201d said Sui. He added, \u201cThis type of summons or interrogation is obviously used to torture people and to cause fear.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The authorities took Mr Zhang into custody before searching for evidence and interrogating and intimidating his co-workers and relatives, obviously to embarrass and build a case against him. The alleged \u2018fraud\u2019 case against Zhang Chunlei reveals particular procedural justice violations routinely committed by the Chinese authorities.<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

It is the latest in a string of known cases of church leaders accused of \u2018fraud\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pastor Hao Zhiwei<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Pastor Hao Zhiwei serves in an unregistered church in Ezhou in central Hubei province. She was detained, together with two female co-workers, on suspicion of fraud on 31 July 2019. Before that, her church had been repeatedly raided by local authorities; church property was confiscated, members were brutally beaten, and several people were placed under administrative detention for \u2018illegal gatherings\u2019, a charge frequently levelled against unregistered religious communities by the Chinese authorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In December 2019, Pastor Hao and the two co-workers were formally charged with \u2018fraud\u2019. The indictment<\/a> issued by the prosecutors suggests that Pastor Hao \u201caccumulated wealth by unfair means\u201d, referring to \u201ctithes\u201d and \u201cofferings\u201d, without the approval of state-sanctioned associations, and alleges that she and the two other defenders \u201cdefrauded others of money with the aim of unauthorized possession using the fake facts as means and hiding real facts.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Si Weijiang, a Christian lawyer representing Pastor Hao, said<\/a> the charge of fraud is \u201ctotally groundless\u201d because \u201cthere is a real church and a real purpose [for using the donations]\u201d, despite the fact that the pastor was not approved by the [Three-Self Patriotic Movement] and [China Christian Council]. He asked: \u201cIs a child without a household registration not a real child? Is a church that is not part of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement not a real church?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While her co-workers pleaded guilty, Pastor Hao has insisted on pleading not guilty. After over 22 months in custody, all three individuals are still awaiting trial. The pastor is facing at least 10 years in prison if convicted, said Mr Si.<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

In July 2020 Mr Si visited Hao at the Ezhou Detention Centre, after which he remarked<\/a>: \u201cI am not optimistic about this case, but Pastor Hao is very optimistic. While she is detained, she is very much at peace. She said that some Biblical questions that she used to find difficult have now become much easier. I asked her why. She said that is because of God\u2019s presence amidst trials.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pastor Bao Guohua and Pastor Xing Wenxiang<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Pastors Bao Guohua and Xing Wenxiang are a married couple that used to lead a government-approved church in Jinhua, Zhejiang province. In August 2015, they were detained, together with several church workers. Chinese state media accused them of dipping into church funds to make money, robbing the faithful and leading a luxurious life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Bao Guohua (left) and Xing Wenxiang (right). Source: RFA<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In February 2016, they were convicted of embezzling money from their congregation, illegal operations, hiding financial accounts, and disturbing social order, and sentenced to 14 and 12 years\u2019 imprisonment respectively. These particularly harsh sentences<\/a> are widely seen as retaliation by authorities for their public opposition to the cross-removal campaign in Zhejiang since 2014.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They have remained imprisoned ever since. In January 2018 an anonymous Christian who met with the couple raised concerns<\/a> in particular for Pastor Xing, who they described as in \u201cpoor health,\u201d adding \u201cThe heavy labour work is too much for her\u2026 She has a painful stiff spine, and her abdominal tumour has been on the verge of malignant transformation. She is particularly concerned about the church. She is at peace about her 12-year sentence. She was prepared for imprisonment over 10 years ago[\u2026]\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOne more weapon\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Leaders of unregistered and registered religious groups in China have come under increasing scrutiny and pressure in recent years. The cases illustrated in this piece are examples of \u2018illegal\u2019 pastors being targeted for serving \u2018illegal\u2019 churches, and \u2018legal\u2019 pastors being punished for not following the lead of the Party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Undoubtedly, the new regulations for religious staff will be used, to quote a Chinese human rights lawyer<\/a>, as \u201cone more weapon in [the Chinese authorities\u2019] arsenal\u201d for arbitrary harassment and persecution against faith leaders, both state-sanctioned and unregistered. Yet alongside the regulations, the authorities are using fraud accusations to target church leaders as individuals as a way to stop their church activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, there will be genuine cases of clergy scammers in China, as elsewhere. However, the fact that the Chinese judicial system does not guarantee a fair trial complicates the situation. If any church leader can be accused of fraud or illegal business operations just for collecting offerings, it leaves pastors, and particularly unregistered pastors, vulnerable to arbitrary interference, harassment, and even imprisonment at any time.<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

It is all the more concerning because it further damages the credibility of the church in question and could even increase public support for a stronger \u2018crackdown\u2019 on religious communities. Let us hope that charging religious leaders with scamming believers will not become a routine way of reining in religion as part of the \u2018China under the Rule of Law\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By CSW’s China Team<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
[jetpack_subscription_form show_subscribers_total=”false” button_on_newline=”false” custom_font_size=”16px” custom_border_radius=”0″ custom_border_weight=”1″ custom_padding=”15″ custom_spacing=”10″ submit_button_classes=”” email_field_classes=”” show_only_email_and_button=”true”]<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Under China\u2019s current religious regulations , only government-approved faith leaders can carry out government-approved religious activities in government-approved sites. As a result, there are many\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":12175,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"regions":[131,128],"class_list":["post-34266","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","regions-china","regions-east-asia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34266","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34266"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34266\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42019,"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34266\/revisions\/42019"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12175"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34266"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34266"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34266"},{"taxonomy":"regions","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csw.org.uk\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions?post=34266"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}